olivLaw · US equity research
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. SBLK
Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight · SIC 4412 · Vertical: Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight (SIC 4412)
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is a global dry bulk shipping company that carries ores, grains, bauxite and other bulk cargoes on international routes. It is in a phase of fleet consolidation, with newbuildings under construction and a possible acquisition of secondhand vessels, in a market cycle that remains volatile. The fleet of 141 vessels totals 14.0 million dwt.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK) stock was 27.20 USD (−0.37% on the day), with market capitalisation 3.1 bn USD, P/E 37.3 on diluted EPS of 0.73 USD over the last 12 months, dividend yield 1.10%, beta 0.72, 52-week range 18.09–32.48 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 34.1
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 26.85 – 30.40
- in the lower half of the band · %B 0.10 · band width 12.4%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 29.88 / 26.64
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.60 / -0.47
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −11.8% | −1.1% | −10.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | −2.7% | −0.5% | −2.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | +1.1% | +4.4% | −3.3 pp | — |
| Year to date | +41.5% | +12.3% | +29.2 pp | — |
| 1 year | +51.5% | +13.5% | +38.0 pp | +30.6% |
| 3 years | +44.8% | +76.4% | −31.7 pp | +39.6% |
| 5 years | +41.1% | +63.7% | −22.6 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 86 percentile of its own 7-quarter history (min 3.4, median 12.0, max 88.3; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 651.6 m | 821.4 m | 693.2 m | 1.4 bn | 1.4 bn | 949.3 m | 1.3 bn | 1.0 bn |
| Revenue YoY | +96.3% | +26.1% | −15.6% | +105.9% | +0.7% | −33.9% | +33.3% | −17.6% |
| Net income | 58.4 m | -16.2 m | 9.7 m | 680.5 m | 566.0 m | 173.6 m | 304.7 m | 84.2 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | −127.7% | unavailable | +6,944.8% | −16.8% | −69.3% | +75.5% | −72.4% |
| Diluted EPS | 0.76 | -0.17 | 0.10 | 6.71 | 5.52 | 1.75 | 2.80 | 0.73 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | −122.4% | unavailable | +6,610.0% | −17.7% | −68.3% | +60.0% | −73.9% |
| net % | 9.0% | -2.0% | 1.4% | 47.7% | 39.4% | 18.3% | 24.1% | 8.1% |
| Free cash flow | -159.6 m | -258.6 m | 98.5 m | 636.9 m | 744.5 m | 317.7 m | 416.1 m | 211.9 m |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 488.5 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- 2.4 bn USD
- Total assets
- 3.8 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 1.78x
- ROE
- 3.4%
- ROA
- 2.1%
- FCF margin
- 20.3%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 693.2 m | 1.4 bn | 1.4 bn | 949.3 m | 1.3 bn | 1.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Operating income | 84.0 m | 739.4 m | 607.6 m | 238.5 m | 383.0 m | 136.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Interest expense | 69.6 m | 56.0 m | 52.6 m | 71.3 m | 91.8 m | 71.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Pre-tax income | 9.8 m | 680.4 m | 566.1 m | 173.7 m | 304.5 m | 85.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Income tax | 152.0 k | 16.0 k | 244.0 k | 183.0 k | -116.0 k | 0 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Net income | 9.7 m | 680.5 m | 566.0 m | 173.6 m | 304.7 m | 84.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.10 | 6.71 | 5.52 | 1.75 | 2.80 | 0.73 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 96.3 m | 101.5 m | 102.5 m | 98.9 m | 108.7 m | 115.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividend per share | 0.05 | 2.25 | 6.50 | 1.57 | 2.50 | 0.30 | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 183.2 m | 450.3 m | 269.8 m | 227.5 m | 425.1 m | 488.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Receivables | 38.1 m | 81.1 m | 84.0 m | 68.6 m | 79.3 m | 83.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Inventories | 47.3 m | 75.1 m | 67.2 m | 62.4 m | 78.6 m | 51.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Current assets | 307.4 m | 682.9 m | 502.1 m | 454.4 m | 659.0 m | 683.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | 2.9 bn | 3.0 bn | 2.9 bn | 2.5 bn | 3.2 bn | 3.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Total assets | 3.2 bn | 3.8 bn | 3.4 bn | 3.0 bn | 4.1 bn | 3.8 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 266.4 m | 290.8 m | 282.6 m | 359.4 m | 399.8 m | 383.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 1.6 bn | 1.7 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.4 bn | 1.6 bn | 1.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Equity | 1.5 bn † | 2.1 bn † | 2.0 bn † | 1.7 bn † | 2.5 bn † | 2.4 bn † | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Shares outstanding at year end | 97.1 m | 102.3 m | 102.9 m | 84.0 m | 117.6 m | 113.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
† equity attributable to the parent's shareholders: in these years the issuer no longer reports the total including non-controlling interests.
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 170.6 m | 767.1 m | 769.9 m | 335.8 m | 471.2 m | 295.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Capex | 72.1 m | 130.1 m | 25.4 m | 18.1 m | 55.1 m | 84.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Free cash flow | 98.5 m ≈ | 636.9 m ≈ | 744.5 m ≈ | 317.7 m ≈ | 416.1 m ≈ | 211.9 m ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026derived |
| Investing cash flow | -66.3 m | -121.3 m | -20.9 m | 235.5 m | 356.2 m | 101.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Financing cash flow | -34.9 m | -368.1 m | -936.0 m | -595.9 m | -648.2 m | -336.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Dividends paid | 4.8 m | 230.5 m | 668.5 m | 158.1 m | 277.0 m | 34.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
| Share repurchases | 0 | 10.3 m | 20.1 m | 393.1 m | 25.3 m | 98.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 19 Mar 2026verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
Score: 40 / 100
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
(margin_of_safety <= -0.25 & agreement in ['high', 'medium'])
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 3.1 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
- Valuation42
- Returns77
- Quality64
- Balance sheet37
- Growth0
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 2.78 – 10.12 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/E2.78 – 10.12 (Mid 5.32)29 companies used · median multiple 7.3x · quartiles 3.8x – 13.9xASC, CCEC, CISS, CMBT, CMRE, CTRM, DAC, DHT, DSX, ECO, EHLD, ESEA, FRO, GASS, GNK, GSL, IMPP, LPG, NMM, NVGS, PANL, PSHG, PXS, SHIP, STNG, TK, TOPS, TRMD, ZIM
- Dividend discount (DDM)3.94 – 5.30 (Mid 4.52)
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Unattractive profile · Score 40/100
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | 8.1% | 29 (vs peers) | 9% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | 251.8% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -10.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | -49.1% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | 1.9x | 6 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 1.8x | 82 (on a fixed band) | 6% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 37.3x | 6 (vs peers) | 15% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | 6.9% | 86 (on a fixed band) | 12% |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | 4.3% | 61 (on a fixed band) | 9% |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | 16.2% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 6% |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet37/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth0/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality64/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Returns77/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Valuation42/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
Memo
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 1.0 bn USD in 2025; YoY growth -17.6%; net margin 8.1%; ROE 3.4%.
The estimated value range is 3.36–7.71 USD per share (median of 2 methods, agreement: high); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 4.92 USD, the price of 27.20 USD leaves a potential of -81.9% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -452.9% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
olivLaw score 40/100, methodological classification: unattractive profile (score, margin of safety and method agreement together; not a judgement of the right price). Not investment advice.
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- FCF conversion: 251.8%
- Current ratio: 1.8x
- FCF yield: 6.9%
- Payout ratio (FCF): 16.2%
What contradicts it
- Net margin: 8.1%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -10.1%
- EPS CAGR 3Y: -49.1%
- Interest coverage: 1.9x
- P/E (TTM): 37.3x
- The price is above the estimated value range
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, Net debt / EBITDA, EV/EBITDA.
Versus the vertical median
Deep Sea Foreign Transportation of Freight (SIC 4412) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FROFrontline plc | 10.8 bn | 28.5 | 15.6% | 19.2% | −8.8% | +106% / +144% |
| CMBTCmb.tech NV | 5.4 bn | 3.8 | 49.1% | 92.6% | −23.9% | +56% / −5% |
| STNGScorpio Tankers Inc. | 4.4 bn | 12.1 | 11.4% | 36.7% | −24.6% | +48% / +57% |
| TRMDTORM plc | 3.8 bn | 13.2 | 13.3% | 21.3% | −14.1% | +76% / +33% |
| DHTDht Holdings, Inc. | 3.5 bn | 16.8 | 19.4% | 42.4% | −12.8% | +69% / +121% |
| ZIMZim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 3.4 bn | 7.1 | 11.9% | 6.9% | −18.1% | +39% / +306% |
| SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp. | 3.1 bn | 37.3 | 3.4% | 8.1% | −17.6% | +52% / +45% |
| ECOOkeanis Eco Tankers Corp. | 3.0 bn | 22.5 | 25.0% | 31.4% | −0.4% | +130% / +252% |
| DACDanaos Corporation | 2.8 bn | 5.7 | 13.7% | 47.4% | +2.8% | +56% / +117% |
| NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P. | 2.5 bn | 8.6 | — | 21.2% | +0.8% | +57% / +232% |
| LPGDorian Lpg Ltd. | 2.1 bn | 6.5 | 28.3% | 55.0% | +36.3% | +99% / +17% |
| SFLSFL Corporation Ltd. | 1.7 bn | — | -2.5% | -3.6% | −18.9% | +42% / +3% |
| CMRECostamare Inc. | 1.6 bn | 4.6 | 15.9% | 41.5% | −1.2% | −14% / +30% |
| GSLGlobal Ship Lease, Inc. | 1.4 bn | 3.5 | 25.5% | 54.3% | +7.8% | +14% / +118% |
| NVGSNavigator Holdings Ltd | 1.3 bn | 13.9 | 8.2% | 17.1% | +3.6% | +14% / +40% |
| CCECCapital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. | 1.2 bn | 7.3 | 12.0% | — | +62.0% | +2% / +57% |
| TKTeekay Corporation Ltd. | 1.2 bn | 11.9 | 4.8% | 10.3% | −22.2% | +38% / +95% |
| GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited | 1.1 bn | 13.9 | 8.9% | 15.5% | −19.1% | +31% / +59% |
| SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. | 987.8 m | 14.3 | 7.8% | 13.4% | −5.6% | +37% / +98% |
| ASCArdmore Shipping Corp | 752.3 m | 21.0 | 6.6% | 13.2% | −23.6% | +51% / +36% |
| HSHPHimalaya Shipping Ltd. | 719.3 m | 40.6 | 11.2% | 13.4% | +6.7% | +72% / +157% |
| PANLPangaea Logistics Solutions Ltd. | 491.7 m | 10.1 | 11.0% | 6.7% | +17.8% | +7% / +7% |
| ESEAEuroseas Ltd. | 459.1 m | 3.3 | 33.1% | 60.1% | +7.0% | +8% / +172% |
| GASSStealthgas Inc. | 308.3 m | 5.1 | 9.2% | 35.0% | +3.5% | +21% / +24% |
| DSXDiana Shipping Inc. | 276.7 m | 21.7 | 3.5% | 8.3% | −6.4% | +21% / −30% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for SBLK from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 14.78 Total return -45% · Per year -45% | 26.27 Total return -2% · Per year -2% | 39.75 Total return 47% · Per year 47% |
| 3 years | 11.74 Total return -55% · Per year -23% | 23.71 Total return -10% · Per year -3% | 39.75 Total return 50% · Per year 14% |
| 5 years | 9.32 Total return -63% · Per year -18% | 21.40 Total return -17% · Per year -4% | 39.75 Total return 53% · Per year 9% |
- Exit P/E± 5.93
- Net margin± 4.15
- Annual revenue growth± 3.75
- Annual dilution± 0.35
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 19 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (09 Oct 2026), 6-K (18 Sept 2026), 6-K (16 Sept 2026), 6-K (15 Sept 2026), 6-K (11 Sept 2026), 6-K (08 Sept 2026).
In brief
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. is a global dry bulk shipping company that carries ores, grains, bauxite and other bulk cargoes on international routes. It is in a phase of fleet consolidation, with newbuildings under construction and a possible acquisition of secondhand vessels, in a market cycle that remains volatile. The fleet of 141 vessels totals 14.0 million dwt 1.
SWOT
Strengths
- The fleet is large, relatively modern and fitted with scrubbers on nearly all vessels, giving a fuel cost advantage 1.
- The company's size allows economies of scale in commercial and technical management and in procurement of fuel and equipment 1.
- The company has invested in emission reduction technologies and in real-time monitoring of fuel consumption 1.
Weaknesses
- Revenue depends heavily on spot charter rates, which are volatile and hard to predict 1.
- The fleet includes older vessels, and secondhand acquisitions can lead to higher operating costs and off-hire periods 1.
- The company relies on third-party or affiliated managers for technical management of the fleet, which can affect operational control 1.
Opportunities
- If the Diana vessel purchase is completed, fleet capacity would rise and the company could gain further economies of scale 1.
- Deliveries of new Kamsarmax vessels in 2026 could improve fleet efficiency and attract customers who prefer modern tonnage 1.
- Rising commodity demand and environmental regulation could favor operators with efficient, properly equipped vessels 1.
Threats
- A rapid fall in charter rates could significantly reduce revenue and the ability to comply with loan covenants 1.
- Geopolitical tensions and the partial closure of shipping routes could disrupt transport and raise security risks 1.
- Trade measures and port fees could affect the company's routes and operating costs 1.
Risks
- Charter rate volatilityhigh
Results depend on charter rates, which are shaped by external factors and can fall quickly, affecting revenue and the ability to comply with loan covenants 1.
- Geopolitical risk and navigation securityhigh
Conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine and attacks on vessels can disrupt routes and raise insurance and security costs 1.
- Newbuilding and acquisition riskmedium
Deliveries of new vessels can be delayed, and the proposed secondhand purchase depends on the outcome of a third-party offer, which adds uncertainty 1.
- Fleet aging and maintenance costsmedium
Older vessels may require costlier repairs and drydockings, and operating costs could rise 1.
- Interest rate and financing exposuremedium
A rise in SOFR could affect earnings and cash flow, and restrictions in financing agreements can limit dividend payments 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If the dry bulk market stays above its long-term average, the company could benefit from good rates on its large fleet and from the advantage of scrubber-fitted vessels.
- Completing the Eagle integration and taking delivery of new vessels could produce economies of scale and a more efficient fleet.
- If the proposed secondhand purchase is completed, the company could expand capacity without waiting for newbuilding deliveries.
What would break the thesis
- Charter rates fell in 2025 compared with 2024, and a further decline could significantly reduce profitability, especially for companies exposed to the spot market.
- Geopolitical tensions and disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could raise costs and reduce demand for bulk commodity transport.
- If the secondhand vessel purchase does not complete or is delayed, growth plans could be affected and costs could rise.
What to watch
- Delivery of the new Kamsarmax vessels under the Qingdao and Hengli contracts2026
- Outcome of Diana's offer for Genco and completion of the vessel purchase2026
- Development of TCE rates and the Baltic Dry Index compared with 2025Q1 2027
- Effects of Middle East tensions on routes and insurance costsnext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 19 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (09 Oct 2026), 6-K (18 Sept 2026), 6-K (16 Sept 2026), 6-K (15 Sept 2026), 6-K (11 Sept 2026), 6-K (08 Sept 2026).
The business
Star Bulk operates a diversified fleet of dry bulk vessels, from Capesize and Newcastlemax to Supramax, with capacities between 55,569 and 209,537 dwt 1. The company was formed through the merger with Eagle in April 2024, which added 52 Supramax/Ultramax vessels, and the integration is described as substantially completed 1. The sources also mention newbuilding commitments and the proposed purchase of 16 secondhand vessels from Diana, subject to the outcome of Diana's offer for Genco 1.
Revenue is generated through short to medium time charters, voyage charters, contracts of affreightment and pools, depending on market conditions. The company relies largely on the spot market, which exposes it to the cyclicality and volatility of charter rates 1. The time charter equivalent rate was 15,360 USD per day in 2025, compared with 18,392 USD in 2024 1.
The company emphasizes the competitive advantage of vessels fitted with scrubbers, which can burn cheaper high-sulfur fuel, and investments in carbon reduction through voyage optimization systems, energy-saving devices and antifouling paints 1. On governance, the sources describe a majority independent Board and a program to pilot AI applications across processes 1.
Segments
Spot and time charter dry bulk vessels
The company can deploy its vessels on the spot market or on time charters, depending on market conditions. Longer contracts provide more predictable cash flows, while the spot market can lift margins in favorable periods but exposes the company to rate declines 1.
Market context
The dry bulk shipping market remains cyclical. Charter rates for dry bulk vessels declined in 2025 from 2024 levels but were sustained above the 10-year average 1. The Baltic Dry Index fell 4.2% from 2024 but averaged 17.4% above the decade average 1. Elevated commodity demand, the partial closure of the Suez Canal and trade tensions between major economies supported the market in 2025 1.
Market developments depend on commodity demand, the pace of newbuilding deliveries, port congestion and environmental regulation, most of which lie outside the company's control 1. Tensions in the Middle East and restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz could affect routes and demand for dry bulk capacity 1.
Trends
- Middle East geopolitical tensionsmixed
The conflict between the United States, Israel and Iran has increased security risks for vessels in the Gulf and led to an effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz. If disruption persists, it could affect oil markets and demand for dry bulk vessels 1.
- Emission and fuel regulationtailwind
IMO sulfur rules have favored vessels fitted with scrubbers, and companies with equipped fleets could gain a commercial edge as these systems become more common 1.
- Rising operating and drydocking costsheadwind
Drydocking expenses rose significantly in 2025, and fleet aging together with secondhand acquisitions could bring higher operating costs and off-hire periods 1.
- Trade tensions and port feesheadwind
US trade policy and port fees on China-linked vessels could change shipping routes and raise costs for shipping companies 1.
Competitive position
The sources analyzed do not give the company's market share or a full list of competitors. The 20-F notes, however, that dry bulk operators compete on rates, capacity and the ability to use cheaper fuel, and that larger fleets can benefit from economies of scale 1.
The advantages the company declares include fleet size, fuel efficiency, scrubber coverage and the ability to use economies of scale in commercial and technical management 1. Competition could intensify if new vessels enter the market or if other companies acquire similar assets 1.
- Genco Shipping & TradingGNK
Named in the source in connection with the Diana offer, on whose outcome the proposed vessel purchase depends.
- Diana Shipping
Seller of the vessels in the proposed purchase agreement, whose completion depends on its offer for Genco.
- Eagle Bulk Shipping
Company acquired through the 2024 merger, whose vessel fleet now forms part of the current fleet.
- Other dry bulk operators
The source does not name other competitors but notes that operators with conventional vessels compete in the same market.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Star Bulk Carriers Director Pappas Buys 74,400 Shares for $2.1 Million. Is This a Sign the Shipping Bull Market Will Continue?Yahoo Finance — News · 19 Sept 2026 · EN
- Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK) Allocates 4.4 Million Shares. Can Fleet Investment Justify Dilution?Yahoo Finance — News · 17 Sept 2026 · EN
- 🇮🇷 ⚡️ — The IRGC Navy struck the Riyan Star bulk carrier with an anti-ship cruis…Telegram — Intel Slava Z (pro-RU OSINT EN) · 12 Sept 2026 · EN
- Star Bulk Carriers Chief Strategy Officer Sells 10,825 SharesYahoo Finance — News · 01 Sept 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 19 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 09 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)09 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)18 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)16 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)15 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)11 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)08 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)04 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)04 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)11 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)07 Aug 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Star Bulk Carriers Corp. · 19 Mar 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.