olivlawolivlaw

olivLaw · US equity research

MicroCloud Hologram Inc. HOLO

Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. · SIC 7370 · Vertical: Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. (SIC 7370)

1.21USD−3.97% · 1 dayClose 04 Nov 2026

MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) develops holographic technology services, notably LiDAR solutions for advanced driver assistance systems and holographic digital twin technology. As demand for automotive sensors and digital modeling expands, the company reported revenue of about 403.7 million RMB for fiscal 2025, yet remains unprofitable, with a net loss of 50.2 million RMB.

The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).

At the close of 04 Nov 2026, MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) stock was 1.21 USD (−3.97% on the day), with market capitalisation 27.2 m USD, beta 1.23, 52-week range 1.12–4.00 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q1 2023): revenue of 6.6 m USD (−72.8% YoY), net income of -3.6 m USD (−206.1% YoY).

Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.

Market cap
27.2 m USD
shares as of 31 Dec 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
Diluted EPS TTM -0.56 · TTM to 31 Dec 2025
E/P (TTM)
-46.28%
TTM to 31 Dec 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
Beta (2y)
1.23
Volatility (1y) 68%
52-week range
1.124.00

Price history

Loading chart…

Technical reading

RSI (14)
40.2
weak (30–45)
Bollinger (20, 2)
1.05 – 1.47
in the lower half of the band · %B 0.38 · band width 33.4%
SMA 50 / 200
1.50 / 1.81
downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
MACD (12, 26, 9)
-0.09 / -0.10
MACD above signal

Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).

Performance

CompanyS&P 500vs S&P 500Vertical median
1 month−21.4%−1.1%−20.3 pp—
3 months−21.4%−0.5%−21.0 pp—
6 months−31.3%+4.4%−35.6 pp—
Year to date−54.2%+12.3%−66.5 pp—
1 year−68.6%+13.5%−82.1 pp−15.2%
3 years−100.0%+76.4%−176.4 pp+5.6%
5 years−100.0%+63.7%−163.7 pp—
Max drawdown (1y)
−72.0%
05 Nov 2025 → 30 Oct 2026
Max drawdown (5y)
−100.0%
23 Jan 2023 → 30 Oct 2026
Compound annual growth (5y)
−89.1%
S&P 500 +10.4%

Price returns, dividends excluded.

Quarterly results

Latest quarter: Q1 2023 · 31 Mar 2023

Revenue
6.6 m USD
−72.8% YoY
Net income
-3.6 m USD
−206.1% YoY
Diluted EPS
unavailable
unavailable YoY
net / operating
-54.9% / -57.8%

Quarterly margins

Quarterly statements · USD

Fiscal yearQ2 '21Q3 '21Q4 '21Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q1 '23
Revenue———24.2 m—24.2 m12.8 m6.6 m
Cost of revenue———13.4 m—14.8 m6.7 m2.7 m
Gross profit-143.2 k——10.8 m—9.4 m6.1 m3.9 m
Research & development———6.6 m—6.9 m31.7 m4.1 m
SG&A———684.6 k—879.9 k952.2 k1.1 m
Operating income———3.3 m—1.0 m-27.0 m-3.8 m
Interest expense—0 ≈050.0 k0 ≈———
Pre-tax income-143.2 k-394.3 k13.2 m3.3 m-103.8 k1.7 m-27.0 m-3.6 m
Income tax—0-124.7 k-56.7 k—57.3 k54.7 k-28.5 k
Net income-143.2 k-394.3 k13.3 m3.4 m-103.8 k1.7 m-27.1 m-3.6 m
Operating cash flow-132.3 k ≈-528.8 k ≈16.9 m272.0 k-532.7 k ≈5.1 m ≈-24.9 m-1.5 m
Capex———706——15.6 k31.2 k
Dividends paid———993————

≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)

E/P over time

E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.

Fiscal years

Fiscal year202020212022202320242025
Revenueunavailable56.3 m72.5 m28.9 m40.8 m56.5 m
Revenue YoYunavailableunavailable+28.8%−60.2%+41.1%+38.6%
Net income-32.3 k12.8 m-20.3 m-11.6 m-9.0 m-7.0 m
Net income YoYunavailableunavailable−259.1%unavailableunavailableunavailable
Diluted EPSunavailable1,454,000.00unavailable-5.33-0.71-0.56
Diluted EPS YoYunavailableunavailableunavailableunavailableunavailableunavailable
net %unavailable22.7%-28.0%-40.1%-22.1%-12.4%
Free cash flowunavailable16.1 m-20.3 m-4.0 m-13.8 m7.9 m

Reported results vs expectations

Loading…

Balance sheet & financial health

Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025

Cash
262.3 m USD
Financial debt
unavailable USD
Net debt
unavailable USD
Equity
383.6 m USD
Total assets
395.3 m USD
Debt / equity
unavailable
Current ratio
33.54x
ROE
-2.3%
ROA
-2.3%
FCF margin
13.9%

Financial statements (source on every figure)

Revenue and net income (USD)

Margins

Income statement · USD

Revenue
2023
28.9 m
2024
40.8 m
2025
56.5 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Cost of revenue
2023
18.3 m
2024
31.6 m
2025
44.5 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Gross profit
2023
10.5 m
2024
9.2 m
2025
12.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Research & development
2023
11.2 m
2024
24.5 m
2025
8.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

SG&A
2023
9.3 m
2024
3.3 m
2025
2.7 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Operating income
2023
-10.9 m
2024
-19.4 m
2025
364.6 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Interest expense
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—

SEC (XBRL)· 31 Mar 2022verified

Pre-tax income
2023
-12.2 m
2024
-8.7 m
2025
-7.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Income tax
2023
-587.4 k
2024
356.5 k
2025
—

SEC (XBRL)· 21 Mar 2025verified

Net income
2023
-11.6 m
2024
-9.0 m
2025
-7.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Diluted EPS
2023
-5.33
2024
-0.71
2025
-0.56

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Weighted average diluted shares
2023
6.6 k
2024
319.5 k
2025
13.2 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Balance sheet · USD

Cash
2023
17.8 m
2024
118.5 m
2025
262.3 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Receivables
2023
1.4 m
2024
3.3 m
2025
3.2 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Inventories
2023
194.0 k
2024
106.5 k
2025
16.8 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Current assets
2023
21.5 m
2024
224.1 m
2025
395.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Property, plant & equipment, net
2023
225.6 k
2024
81.2 k
2025
69.9 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Goodwill
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—

SEC (XBRL)· 14 Mar 2023verified

Intangibles (excl. goodwill)
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—

SEC (XBRL)· 14 Mar 2023verified

Total assets
2023
22.7 m
2024
224.7 m
2025
395.3 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Accounts payable
2023
185.6 k
2024
1.9 m
2025
3.0 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Current liabilities
2023
2.4 m
2024
4.3 m
2025
11.8 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Total liabilities
2023
2.7 m
2024
4.4 m
2025
11.8 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Equity
2023
19.9 m
2024
220.2 m
2025
383.6 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Shares outstanding at year end
2023
5.9 m
2024
54.5 m
2025
22.5 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Cash flow · USD

Operating cash flow
2023
-3.9 m
2024
-13.8 m
2025
7.9 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Capex
2023
109.9 k
2024
1.7 k
2025
14.0 k

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Free cash flow
2023
-4.0 m ≈
2024
-13.8 m ≈
2025
7.9 m ≈

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026derived

Investing cash flow
2023
-195.1 k
2024
-95.0 m
2025
-40.7 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Financing cash flow
2023
312.8 k
2024
209.6 m
2025
176.4 m

SEC (XBRL)· 27 Mar 2026verified

Computed indicators

Growth

Revenue growth (YoY)
38.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue CAGR 3Y
-8.0%
computed by olivLawFY 2022 → FY 2025
Revenue CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 3Y
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
Net income CAGR 5Y
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive
EPS CAGR 3Y
unavailable
input data missing
EPS CAGR 5Y
unavailable
input data missing
FCF growth (YoY)
unavailable
the base of the ratio is not positive

Profitability

Gross margin
21.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
EBITDA margin
unavailable
input data missing
EBIT margin
0.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Net margin
-12.4%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF margin
13.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025

Returns

ROE
-2.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROA
-2.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
ROIC
unavailable
input data missing
ROCE
0.1%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Payout ratio (EPS)
unavailable
input data missing
Payout ratio (FCF)
unavailable
input data missing

Balance sheet

Net debt
unavailable
input data missing
Net debt / EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
Debt / equity
unavailable
input data missing
Interest coverage
unavailable
the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used

Liquidity

Current ratio
33.5x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Cash ratio
22.3x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

Cash

Operating cash flow
7.9 m USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Capital expenditure
14.0 k USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Free cash flow
7.9 m USD
computed by olivLawFY 2025
FCF conversion
unavailable
insufficient data
Cash conversion
unavailable
input data missing

Efficiency

Days sales outstanding
21 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Days payables outstanding
20 days
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025

Market and valuation

Market capitalisation
27.2 m USD
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Enterprise value
unavailable
input data missing
Market cap / net income TTM
unavailable
insufficient data
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
Earnings yield
-46.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
P/B
0.1x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
P/S
0.5x
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
EV/EBIT
unavailable
input data missing
EV/Sales
unavailable
input data missing
P/FCF
3.5x
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
FCF yield
28.9%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
input data missing
Shareholder yield (distributions)
unavailable
input data missing

4 indicators that do not apply to the sector.

Valuation

olivLaw classification

Insufficient data
What is missing
  • valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.

Closing price

1.21 USD

04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series

Market cap: 27.2 m USD

Key indicators

Market capitalisation
27.2 m USD
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
P/E (TTM)
unavailable
insufficient data
P/B
0.1x
computed by olivLawbalance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
EV/EBITDA
unavailable
input data missing
ROE
-2.3%
computed by olivLawFY 2025 · balance sheet at 31 Dec 2025
Net margin
-12.4%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Revenue growth (YoY)
38.6%
computed by olivLawFY 2025
Dividend yield
unavailable
input data missing

Coverage and freshness

30/37 reporting lines present
Latest full fiscal year: 2025
Latest reported period: 31 Dec 2025
Latest balance sheet date: 31 Dec 2025
Share count (cover of the latest filing), as of: 31 Dec 2025
Source: SEC (XBRL)published 27 Mar 2026
verified 354derived 26

Score by group

72% · Insufficient data

Estimated value range

unavailable — no valuation method could be computed

Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.

Valuation methods

  • DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the reported interest expense is far older than the latest period (the filer changed its XBRL tag): a stale figure is not used
  • Peers: EV/Salesunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
  • Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)

no valuation method could be computed

Multiple comparisons use the SIC vertical: Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. (SIC 7370)

Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.

Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)

Risk-free rate
4.3%
Equity risk premium
5.0%
Beta (default)
1.00
Cost of equity
9.3%
Terminal growth
2.5%

Factor scorecard

Insufficient data

Minimum-evidence gate: valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1

FactorValueScoreWeight used
Gross margin · Quality21.3%0 (on a fixed band)15%
EBIT margin · Quality0.6%46 (vs peers)12%
FCF margin · Quality13.9%56 (on a fixed band)12%
Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth-8.0%0 (on a fixed band)24%
Revenue growth (YoY) · Growth38.6%85 (vs peers)12%
Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheetunavailableunavailable—
Current ratio · Balance sheet33.5x100 (on a fixed band)9%
EV/Sales · Valuationunavailableunavailable—
FCF yield · Valuation28.9%100 (on a fixed band)18%
Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returnsunavailableunavailable—

Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.

Score groups

  • Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
  • Growth28/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
  • Quality31/100 · 3/3 factors with a value
  • Returns· partialunavailable · 0/1 factors with a value
  • Valuation· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value

A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.

Memo

MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2025-12-31.

Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 56.5 m USD in 2025; YoY growth 38.6%; net margin -12.4%; ROE -2.3%.

Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.

Insufficient data for a verdict (valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).

Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.

What supports the thesis

  • Revenue growth (YoY): 38.6%
  • Current ratio: 33.5x
  • FCF yield: 28.9%

What contradicts it

  • Gross margin: 21.3%
  • Revenue CAGR 3Y: -8.0%

Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): Net debt / EBITDA, EV/Sales, Shareholder yield (distributions).

Versus the vertical median

Services-Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. (SIC 7370) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies

Multiples and returns vs the median

P/E
—
vertical median 22.2x
EV/EBITDA
—
vertical median 15.7x
P/S
0.5x
vertical median 2.2x
below median (−78.3%)
P/B
0.1x
vertical median 1.8x
below median (−95.9%)
ROE
-2.3%
vertical median 4.0%
below median (−158.4%)
Net margin
-12.4%
vertical median 2.5%
below median (−589.1%)
EBIT margin
0.6%
vertical median 2.3%
below median (−72.5%)
Revenue YoY
38.6%
vertical median 9.0%
above median (+327.3%)
Net debt/EBITDA
—
vertical median 0.4x
Dividend yield
—
vertical median 0.8%

Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)

Companies in the vertical

Market capP/EROENet marginRevenue YoY1A / 3A
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.3,552.1 bn15.144.3%50.0%+15.1%−10% / +118%
APPAppLovin Corporation90.0 bn18.3210.1%65.9%+70.0%−55% / +625%
NBISNebius Group N.V.35.8 bn428.82.1%15.6%+479.0%+49% / unavailable
FDSFactset Research Systems Inc12.1 bn23.525.5%21.5%+6.7%+23% / −25%
DOCNDigitalOcean Holdings, Inc.9.9 bn281.35.1%3.1%+15.5%+89% / +184%
MTCHMatch Group, Inc.9.1 bn13.7—20.7%+0.2%+21% / +24%
SOGPSound Group Inc.8.8 bn350.370.4%7.1%+59.4%−21% / +265%
SIFYSify Technologies Ltd5.8 bn—-4.1%-2.0%+9.0%+20% / +53%
WIXWix.com Ltd.4.4 bn91.5—2.5%+13.2%−16% / −21%
MGNIMagnite, Inc.3.3 bn19.920.4%23.6%+6.9%+55% / +182%
GRNDGrindr Inc.2.4 bn27.6108.7%18.7%+27.6%+9% / +108%
DVDoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.2.1 bn34.05.8%8.2%+13.9%+29% / −59%
BZKanzhun Limited1.7 bn41.616.0%33.1%+17.3%−21% / +6%
WBWeibo Corporation1.6 bn3.812.1%25.6%+0.1%−35% / −36%
DJTTrump Media & Technology Group Corp.1.2 bn—-78.9%-28,867.7%+1.8%−61% / −74%
TRIPTripadvisor, Inc.1.2 bn332.10.8%0.3%+3.1%−31% / −43%
SMWBSimilarweb Ltd.766.1 m—-129.6%-11.7%+13.1%+13% / +75%
BMBLBumble Inc.718.8 m—-85.9%-61.8%−9.9%+69% / −57%
RXTRackspace Technology, Inc.716.2 m——-5.9%−1.9%+165% / +123%
NEXNNexxen International Ltd.513.3 m22.25.0%6.9%−0.2%+41% / +151%
RZLVRezolve AI plc460.8 m—-98.7%-216.7%+2,224.2%−55% / −87%
YALAYalla Group Limited413.9 m6.819.6%43.3%+0.7%−20% / −6%
ZIPZiprecruiter, Inc.321.9 m12.9—6.2%−5.3%−5% / −66%
BLNDBlend Labs, Inc.302.7 m——-3.3%+6.8%−59% / +1%
SSTSystem1, Inc.161.0 m—-581.6%-50.7%−22.6%−53% / −88%

1- and 3-year price returns: for HOLO from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.

olivLaw engine forecast

The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.

The engine has no published run for this company yet.

Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)

Illustrative scenarios

Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.

Bear
Allowed range: -50 … 50%
Allowed range: -100 … 100%
Allowed range: 0 … 100
Allowed range: -10 … 20%
Allowed range: 0 … 100%
Base
Allowed range: -50 … 50%
Allowed range: -100 … 100%
Allowed range: 0 … 100
Allowed range: -10 … 20%
Allowed range: 0 … 100%
Bull
Allowed range: -50 … 50%
Allowed range: -100 … 100%
Allowed range: 0 … 100
Allowed range: -10 … 20%
Allowed range: 0 … 100%
Nothing is saved.

Estimated price (USD)

Estimated priceBearBaseBull
1 years
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
3 years
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
5 years
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
insufficient data
Total return unavailable · Per year unavailable
What moves the 3-year price the most

    AI analysis

    AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

    Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 27 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (27 Aug 2026), 6-K (04 May 2026).

    In brief

    MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) develops holographic technology services, notably LiDAR solutions for advanced driver assistance systems and holographic digital twin technology. As demand for automotive sensors and digital modeling expands, the company reported revenue of about 403.7 million RMB for fiscal 2025, yet remains unprofitable, with a net loss of 50.2 million RMB.

    SWOT

    Strengths

    • The company holds an intellectual property portfolio described as among the largest in its field, backed by a dedicated research team.
    • The customer base has improved in quality, with higher retention among high-paying customers.
    • The company has diversified its offering across hardware solutions and advertising and development services.

    Weaknesses

    • The company still reports net losses, although they have narrowed compared with earlier years.
    • Reliance on China's automotive industry exposes the company to cyclical swings in production and sales.
    • The total number of customers declined, so revenue depends on a smaller group of major clients.

    Opportunities

    • If holographic LiDAR systems are integrated into future vehicle generations, demand could grow significantly.
    • Applications in robotics, drones, security and smart cities could diversify revenue sources.
    • Extending holographic digital twin services to industries such as finance and local government could open new markets.

    Threats

    • Competitors with greater financial and technical resources could attract the company's customers.
    • Alternative technologies, such as other sensing modalities, could become dominant in autonomous driving.
    • Competitive pricing pressure could reduce profit margins.

    Risks

    • Uncertain LiDAR adoptionhigh

      If the LiDAR market, especially holographic LiDAR, develops more slowly than expected, the business could be materially affected 1.

    • Insufficient profitabilityhigh

      The company is not yet profitable, and persistent losses could require additional financing on uncertain terms 1.

    • Automotive industry cyclicalitymedium

      Declines in Chinese automotive production could reduce demand for the company's products 1.

    • Costly technology developmentmedium

      R&D spending is substantial and outcomes are not assured, which could weigh on margins 1.

    • Competition and pricing pressuremedium

      Larger competitors or low-cost alternatives could force price cuts and loss of market share 1.

    Investment thesis

    What would need to be true (bull case)

    • Revenue growth in holographic solutions and services in 2025 shows demand for the company's products can rise, especially as major clients are consolidated.
    • If ADAS and autonomous driving reach broad adoption, the company's position in holographic LiDAR could become a competitive advantage.
    • Diversification into robotics, security and smart cities could reduce dependence on a single sector.

    What would break the thesis

    • The company continues to report net losses, and without improved profitability it could depend on external financing.
    • The customer count fell in 2025, which could make revenue more vulnerable to the loss of major clients.
    • If the holographic LiDAR market remains underdeveloped or other sensor technologies gain ground, the company's competitive position could suffer.

    What to watch

    • Trend in gross margins and net loss relative to fiscal 2025next 10-K
    • Customer count and retention rate, especially among high-paying customers2026
    • Integration of holographic LiDAR systems into new vehicle models2027
    • Contribution of digital twin services and non-automotive applications to revenuenext 10-K

    Products, market & competition

    AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.

    Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 27 Mar 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (27 Aug 2026), 6-K (04 May 2026).

    The business

    MicroCloud Hologram Inc. describes its business as providing holographic technology services to customers worldwide. Its offerings include high-precision holographic LiDAR, point cloud algorithms, sensor chip design and holographic vehicle vision technology for ADAS, and it also provides holographic digital twin services and has built a proprietary resource library in this field 1. The company was formed through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company and has been listed on NASDAQ under HOLO since September 2022 1.

    Revenue comes from two sources: holographic solutions, including LiDAR and other hardware, licensing, content and technology development services, and holographic technology services, namely advertising, software development kit services and promotion services 1. In fiscal 2025, holographic solutions revenue was 199.3 million RMB and holographic technology service revenue was 204.4 million RMB, roughly balanced 1.

    The company restructured its customer base in 2025: total customers fell to 128 as it dropped low-value accounts and focused on core major clients, lifting its customer retention rate to 41% 1. Its principal executive office is in Shenzhen, China, and its operations are mainly in China 1.

    Segments

    Holographic solutions

    This segment includes LiDAR and other holographic hardware products, licensing, content and technology development services. Revenue grew in 2025 on expanded customer demand for holographic solutions and accounts for about half of total revenue 1.

    Holographic technology services

    This segment covers holographic advertising, software development kit services and promotion services. The 2025 increase was attributed mainly to the merger with Shanghai Kuosou, completed during the year 1.

    Market context

    The company argues the holographic LiDAR market is underpenetrated in China and globally, particularly outside automotive 1. Broader adoption, however, depends on commercialization of ADAS and autonomous driving, which remains early for many automotive customers 1.

    Chinese automotive demand is cyclical and fluctuates from year to year, which feeds directly into the company's product volumes 1. The holographic technology services market is described as intensely competitive with limited barriers to entry 1.

    Trends

    • ADAS and autonomous driving adoptiontailwind

      Growth in driver assistance and autonomous driving systems could support demand for holographic LiDAR sensors if they are designed into future vehicle generations 1.

    • Expansion into robotics, security and mappingtailwind

      The company targets industrial robots, drones, security systems, mapping and smart city applications, which could reduce its reliance on the automotive sector 1.

    • Cyclicality of China's auto industryheadwind

      Chinese automotive production fluctuates significantly, and these swings pass through to demand for the company's products 1.

    • Pricing pressure and R&D spendingmixed

      Competition could push prices down, and high costs of developing complex LiDAR components could compress margins if they do not translate into revenue 1.

    Competitive position

    The analyzed sources do not name specific competitors. The filing states only that the market is intensely competitive, that some rivals have greater financial, technical and marketing resources, and that prices can be pressured by alternatives with limited functionality or available free of charge 1.

    The company's stated advantages include an extensive intellectual property portfolio, a diversified customer base and an R&D team, but these must be backed by clear service differentiation against rivals 1.

    • Providers of LiDAR sensors using other technologies

      The filing refers to competition from other sensing modalities without naming companies.

    • ADAS solution providers

      Competitors in this segment are not named in the document but have greater marketing and development resources.

    • Online advertising platforms

      The filing mentions competition in internet advertising services without naming rivals.

    • Digital twin developers

      Companies offering digital modeling and simulation are not identified in the source.

    News & filings

    Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.