olivLaw · US equity research
Swvl Holdings Corp SWVL
Services-Business Services, NEC · SIC 7389 · Vertical: Services-Business Services, NEC (SIC 7389)
Swvl Holdings Corp is a mobility company offering flexible mass transit with dynamically routed minibuses for commuters and corporate clients across several cities in the Middle East, Africa and, more recently, the United Kingdom. It matters now because the company is shifting from consumer rides toward B2B services (TaaS and SaaS), which could change its margin profile, while it has also narrowed its footprint after its Portfolio Optimization Program, as described in its FY 2025 annual report.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 02 Nov 2026, Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) stock was 4.04 USD (+7.16% on the day), with beta 0.82, 52-week range 1.32–7.94 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 53.5
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 3.55 – 4.08
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.93 · band width 13.8%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 4.13 / 2.22
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.00 / -0.03
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | +4.4% | −2.3% | +6.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | +182.5% | −0.8% | +183.3 pp | — |
| 6 months | +113.8% | +4.7% | +109.0 pp | — |
| Year to date | +112.6% | +10.2% | +102.5 pp | — |
| 1 year | +33.4% | +10.3% | +23.1 pp | −15.5% |
| 3 years | +298.0% | +73.0% | +225.0 pp | −3.0% |
| 5 years | −98.4% | +61.8% | −160.2 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | unavailable | 12.4 m | 15.0 m | 25.6 m | 43.0 m | 22.9 m | 17.2 m |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | unavailable | +21.3% | +70.6% | +68.2% | −46.9% | −24.7% |
| Net income | 35.3 m | 35.3 m | -29.7 m | -141.4 m | -116.5 m | 3.1 m | -10.3 m |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | 0.0% | −184.3% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −438.3% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | 809.00 | -0.36 | -20.92 | -18.21 | 0.28 | -1.19 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | −100.0% | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | −525.0% |
| net % | unavailable | 285.5% | -198.4% | -553.2% | -270.9% | 13.4% | -60.1% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | -40.4 m | -30.8 m | -62.5 m | -118.5 m | -9.1 m | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2024 · 31 Dec 2024
- Cash
- 5.0 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- -687.9 k USD
- Total assets
- 16.4 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- unavailable
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -54.0%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12.4 m | 15.0 m | 25.6 m | 43.0 m | 22.9 m | 17.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Cost of revenue | 33.8 m | 19.2 m | 31.3 m | 42.8 m | 18.7 m | 13.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Gross profit | 21.4 m | -4.2 m | -5.8 m | 179.8 k | 4.1 m | 3.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Operating income | 40.9 m | -24.6 m | -88.1 m | -80.1 m | 12.8 m | -8.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Interest expense | 70.6 k | 63.7 k | 1.5 m | 3.6 m | 61.4 k | 41.0 k | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Pre-tax income | 40.6 m | -24.0 m | -133.8 m | -101.7 m | 13.1 m | -11.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Income tax | 5.4 m | -3.2 m | -4.7 m | -3.2 m | -41.3 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 30 Apr 2024verified |
| Net income | 35.3 m | -29.7 m | -141.4 m | -116.5 m | 3.1 m | -10.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Diluted EPS | 809.00 | -0.36 | -20.92 | -18.21 | 0.28 | -1.19 | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | — | — | 11.0 m | 11.0 m | 11.0 m | 8.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 15.3 m | 10.3 m | 9.5 m | 1.5 m | 2.9 m | 5.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Receivables | — | 2.9 m | 6.6 m | 14.8 m | 5.3 m | 4.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Current assets | — | 13.5 m | 34.6 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 15 Apr 2022verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 509.8 k | 648.7 k | 1.3 m | 751.7 k | 457.8 k | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Goodwill | — | — | 4.4 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 15 Apr 2022verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | 0 | 988.4 k | 10.5 m | 225.8 k | 106.3 k | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Total assets | — | 24.8 m | 59.3 m | 57.5 m | 21.9 m | 16.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Accounts payable | — | — | 20.0 m | 33.4 m | 7.8 m | 9.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Short-term debt | — | — | 74.6 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 15 Apr 2022verified |
| Long-term debt | — | — | 337.5 k | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 15 Apr 2022verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 5.6 m | 145.0 m | — | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 15 Apr 2022verified |
| Total liabilities | — | 6.3 m | 149.1 m | 54.8 m | 16.0 m | 17.1 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Equity | 19.2 m | 18.4 m | -89.7 m | 2.6 m | 5.9 m | -687.9 k | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -40.0 m | -30.5 m | -62.1 m | -117.7 m | -9.1 m | -3.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Capex | 388.6 k | 213.0 k | 319.5 k | 817.6 k | 17.2 k | — | SEC (XBRL)· 30 Apr 2024verified |
| Free cash flow | -40.4 m ≈ | -30.8 m ≈ | -62.5 m ≈ | -118.5 m ≈ | -9.1 m ≈ | — | SEC (XBRL)· 30 Apr 2024derived |
| Investing cash flow | -388.6 k | -213.0 k | -11.1 m | -8.1 m | 8.8 m | 583.4 k | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
| Financing cash flow | 46.4 m | 26.0 m | 72.7 m | 125.1 m | 343.9 k | 4.0 m | SEC (XBRL)· 02 Apr 2025verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
1 indicators that do not apply to the sector.
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 3 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 20.8% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
02 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
The data is older than the freshness threshold.
Score by group
21% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 20.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -60.1% | 13 (vs peers) | 30% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -12.4% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 40% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -207.2x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 30% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial0/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial0/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial13/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL). Latest full fiscal year: 2024; data up to 2024-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 17.2 m USD in 2024; YoY growth -24.7%; net margin -60.1%; ROE -184.0%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 3 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 20.8% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
No signal among the computed factors. That is not an absence of risk: factors without data were not assessed, and business risks (margins, inventory, demand) are in the source-based analysis.
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -60.1%
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -12.4%
- Interest coverage: -207.2x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, Current ratio, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Services-Business Services, NEC (SIC 7389) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBERUber Technologies, Inc | 136.3 bn | 14.7 | 38.4% | 17.3% | +18.3% | −24% / +18% |
| MELIMercadoLibre, Inc. | 85.0 bn | 45.6 | 27.5% | 5.3% | +39.1% | −19% / +3% |
| EBAYeBay Inc. | 53.1 bn | 26.3 | 46.6% | 16.9% | +7.9% | +46% / +195% |
| PYPLPayPal Holdings, Inc. | 48.8 bn | 11.2 | 23.8% | 13.8% | +4.3% | −6% / +2% |
| MSCIMsci Inc. | 45.6 bn | 33.7 | — | 40.3% | +9.7% | +13% / +22% |
| FISVFiserv, Inc. | 27.6 bn | 10.0 | 10.7% | 13.4% | +3.6% | −16% / −60% |
| CPAYCorpay, Inc | 26.9 bn | 24.9 | 30.5% | 22.7% | +13.9% | +38% / +70% |
| TCOMTrip.com Group Limited | 26.6 bn | 5.6 | 21.7% | 53.4% | +22.2% | −41% / +17% |
| GPNGlobal Payments Inc. | 26.4 bn | — | -4.1% | -9.1% | −0.4% | +32% / −14% |
| BRBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 21.0 bn | 19.2 | 40.9% | 15.0% | +8.5% | −19% / −5% |
| FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc. | 20.7 bn | 6.2 | 22.3% | 27.6% | +5.4% | −39% / −32% |
| RBARB Global, Inc | 17.3 bn | 39.2 | 8.8% | 10.0% | +7.2% | −5% / +47% |
| FICOFair Isaac Corp | 15.6 bn | 20.9 | — | 34.1% | +15.9% | −60% / −33% |
| CSGPCoStar Group, Inc. | 12.8 bn | 72.5 | 2.2% | 4.9% | +18.7% | −54% / −62% |
| AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc | 12.5 bn | 31.2 | 8.9% | 9.5% | +5.4% | −3% / −25% |
| AMTMAmentum Holdings, Inc. | 5.5 bn | 27.0 | 4.5% | 1.4% | +71.6% | −22% / unavailable |
| TNETTrinet Group, Inc. | 3.1 bn | 18.4 | 141.6% | 3.6% | −0.9% | +15% / −42% |
| PAYOPayoneer Global Inc. | 2.4 bn | 49.1 | 7.1% | 4.6% | +7.7% | +24% / +38% |
| TICTIC Solutions, Inc. | 2.2 bn | — | -7.1% | -5.6% | unavailable | +6% / unavailable |
| WUThe Western Union Company | 2.0 bn | 5.1 | 44.0% | 9.8% | −3.8% | −28% / −46% |
| LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc | 1.4 bn | 43.7 | 15.0% | 6.8% | +31.2% | +49% / +133% |
| NUTXNutex Health Inc. | 1.3 bn | 7.3 | 57.2% | 21.2% | +82.4% | +61% / +551% |
| QNSTQuinStreet, Inc. | 1.0 bn | 12.5 | 28.6% | 6.3% | +18.3% | +26% / +41% |
| FVRRFiverr International Ltd. | 312.2 m | 15.4 | 5.4% | 4.9% | +10.1% | −59% / −67% |
| IMXIInternational Money Express, Inc. | 287.6 m | 15.2 | 11.9% | 3.4% | −7.7% | −38% / −54% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for SWVL from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 20 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (22 Sept 2026), 6-K (10 Sept 2026), 6-K (08 Sept 2026), 6-K (01 Sept 2026), 6-K (26 Aug 2026).
In brief
Swvl Holdings Corp is a mobility company offering flexible mass transit with dynamically routed minibuses for commuters and corporate clients across several cities in the Middle East, Africa and, more recently, the United Kingdom. It matters now because the company is shifting from consumer rides toward B2B services (TaaS and SaaS), which could change its margin profile, while it has also narrowed its footprint after its Portfolio Optimization Program, as described in its FY 2025 annual report 1.
SWOT
Strengths
- Proprietary technology that handles routing, demand prediction and pricing, and reported high first-stop reliability for 2025 1.
- Early presence in mass-transit ridesharing and a diversified model with both B2C and B2B offerings, giving several avenues for growth 1.
- TaaS offerings carry no per-rider utilization risk, which could support steadier margins 1.
Weaknesses
- Limited operating history and a changing business model make future performance hard to assess 1.
- The company has not historically maintained insurance coverage for its operations, so uninsured losses could affect results 1.
- Material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting were identified, which could lead to misstatements if not remediated 1.
Opportunities
- Expanding SaaS and TaaS offerings to companies, schools and municipalities, planned for 2026, could open new revenue streams 1.
- Entry into new markets such as the UK and Kuwait could diversify revenue if upfront investments prove effective 1.
- Safety and accessibility problems in traditional public transport could create demand for flexible alternatives 1.
Threats
- Competition from public transport, taxis and other ridesharing platforms could reduce market share 1.
- Regulatory changes on driver classification and data protection could raise costs or limit the operating model 1.
- A security incident or data breach, similar to one already experienced, could damage reputation and user trust 1.
Risks
- Limited operating historymedium
The business model has shifted from B2C toward TaaS and SaaS, which makes future revenue and expenses hard to estimate 1.
- Driver classificationhigh
Litigation and debate over the status of drivers on ridesharing platforms could require the company to treat them as employees, with cost impact 1.
- Data securityhigh
The company has previously suffered a data breach that exposed customer information, and a similar event could disrupt operations and reputation 1.
- Internal controlsmedium
Identified weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting could lead to inaccurate reporting if not remediated 1.
- Nasdaq listing compliancemedium
Failure to meet Nasdaq continued listing requirements could lead to delisting and limit access to capital 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If corporate offerings expand as planned, revenue could become steadier and more profitable than consumer rides 1.
- High service reliability and optimized routing could support driver and rider retention 1.
- Entry into new markets such as the UK and Kuwait could start a new growth phase if those markets mature 1.
What would break the thesis
What to watch
- Development of TaaS and SaaS revenue relative to B2C2026
- Performance of the UK and Kuwait markets after launch2026
- Remediation of the reported internal control weaknessesnext 20-F
- Outcome of driver classification litigation in operating countries2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 20 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (22 Sept 2026), 6-K (10 Sept 2026), 6-K (08 Sept 2026), 6-K (01 Sept 2026), 6-K (26 Aug 2026).
The business
The company describes its mission as identifying and solving inefficiencies in urban public transport where infrastructure is low quality or missing, offering an alternative to traditional transit, taxis or other ridesharing services 1. Its platform coordinates a network of minibuses and other vehicles on fixed and semi-fixed routes, with advance booking and payment by cash, card or digital wallet 1. The company reports an average monthly first station reliability rate of approximately 97.6% in FY 2025, versus 97.2% in FY 2024 1.
Swvl was founded in 2017 in Cairo and moved its headquarters to Dubai, UAE, in 2019, with a regional headquarters in Riyadh opened in October 2024 1. It expanded into the UK in June 2025 and launched in Kuwait in January 2026 1. It currently operates in Egypt, KSA, UAE, the UK and Kuwait, with employees also in Pakistan and India 1.
The annual report shows Swvl in a phase of redefining its business model, as the Portfolio Optimization Program reduced the number of active markets and changed the direction of growth 1. The company is a foreign private issuer and reports under IFRS rather than US GAAP 1.
Segments
B2C (commuter services)
The original offering, where riders book seats on minibuses running fixed and semi-fixed routes within and between cities. Fixed fares depend on distance and anticipated demand, and summer seasonality in Egypt, from July to September, brings more travel 1.
Swvl Business (TaaS)
Dedicated routes for employees or students of companies, schools and municipalities that do not run their own fleets. Pricing is set per route rather than per rider, so the company does not take on utilization risk 1.
Swvl Business (SaaS)
Software for customers that run their own fleets, including the Swvl Business application and fleet management modules. The company plans to expand this offering in 2026 and uses a tiered cost-plus pricing model 1.
Market context
The company argues that traditional public transport in many developing countries is rigid, inaccessible or unsafe, and that taxi services are too expensive for many commuters 1. The report cites a 2015 ADB study in which 78% of women surveyed in Karachi said they had been harassed on public transport at least once in the preceding year 1. Demand for flexible services could grow if these problems persist, although the mass-transit ridesharing industry is described as still at an early stage 1.
The market is intensely competitive and changing rapidly in technology, and the company expects competition to increase from both established players and new entrants 1. If regulation on driver classification, or data protection frameworks, change, costs and the operating model could be affected 1.
Trends
- Shift toward B2B (TaaS and SaaS)tailwind
The company is expanding corporate offerings, which carry no per-rider utilization risk and could have higher margins if the expansion succeeds 1.
- Narrower geographic footprintheadwind
The Portfolio Optimization Program led to the discontinuation of entities and a focus on fewer markets, which could limit near-term growth while simplifying operations 1.
- International expansionmixed
Entry into the UK and Kuwait signals a growth direction, but each new market requires upfront investment in drivers and routes that can weigh on results in those periods 1.
- Regulatory pressureheadwind
Legal changes on driver classification, data privacy and listing requirements raise costs and the risk of non-compliance 1.
Competitive position
The main competition for riders is public transport, and the company also faces taxis, private fleet operators and other ridesharing platforms such as Uber 1. In B2B, it compares itself with corporate ridesharing providers such as Via 1.
The company says its edge lies in combining technology, early entry into mass-transit ridesharing and a diverse set of B2C and B2B offerings 1. If these advantages do not hold as competitors grow, its competitive position could weaken 1.
- Via
Corporate ridesharing and public transport software provider, cited as a competitor for TaaS and SaaS services.
- UberUBER
Ridesharing platform cited as a competitor in taxi and on-demand transport.
- Flixbus
Intercity bus operator cited as an example of a business offering similar mass-transit services.
- Shuttl
Minibus transport operator named in the report among firms with comparable services.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Swvl (SWVL) is Raising $13M for U.S. Expansion and a Transport Lending Offering. Is It Taking On Too Much at Once?Yahoo Finance — News · 28 Aug 2026 · EN
The latest news item in our archive is from 28 Aug 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 08 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)08 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)22 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)10 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)08 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)01 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)26 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)25 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)07 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)16 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)20 Apr 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Swvl Holdings Corp · 20 Apr 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.