olivLaw · US equity research
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. DMLP
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas · SIC 1311 · Vertical: Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas (SIC 1311)
Dorchester Minerals is a Nasdaq-listed limited partnership that holds mineral, royalty and net profits interests in oil and natural gas across 28 states without operating the wells. Its income depends on oil and gas prices, which fell sharply for gas in the first half of 2026 while oil rose, and the company has kept adding acreage through unit-for-interest acquisitions.
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Dorchester Minerals, L.P. (DMLP) stock was 27.81 USD (−1.44% on the day), with market capitalisation 1.4 bn USD, P/E 24.0 on diluted EPS of 1.16 USD over the last 12 months, beta 0.23, 52-week range 21.26–30.69 USD. Latest reported quarter (Q2 2026): revenue of 56.1 m USD (+73.1% YoY), net income of 30.9 m USD (+150.0% YoY), diluted EPS 0.62 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 32.0
- weak (30–45)
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 28.25 – 31.40
- below the lower band · %B -0.14 · band width 10.6%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 29.42 / 27.42
- mixed trend
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.13 / 0.18
- MACD below signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −4.1% | −2.0% | −2.1 pp | — |
| 3 months | +9.0% | −2.2% | +11.2 pp | — |
| 6 months | +6.5% | +4.3% | +2.3 pp | — |
| Year to date | +24.4% | +10.6% | +13.8 pp | — |
| 1 year | +18.7% | +10.5% | +8.3 pp | +26.1% |
| 3 years | −2.1% | +73.7% | −75.8 pp | +12.1% |
| 5 years | +44.7% | +61.7% | −17.0 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
Latest quarter: Q2 2026 · 30 Jun 2026
Quarterly margins
Quarterly statements · USD
| Fiscal year | Q3 '24 | Q4 '24 | Q1 '25 | Q2 '25 | Q3 '25 | Q4 '25 | Q1 '26 | Q2 '26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 53.5 m | 39.7 m | 43.2 m | 32.4 m | 35.4 m | 41.9 m | 58.9 m | 56.1 m |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 10.0 m | 18.0 m | 16.8 m | 14.7 m | 17.0 m | 17.8 m | 20.9 m | 15.8 m |
| Net income | 36.4 m | 14.2 m | 17.6 m | 12.3 m | 11.2 m | 16.2 m | 29.1 m | 30.9 m |
| Diluted EPS | 0.87 | — | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.23 | — | 0.59 | 0.62 |
| Operating cash flow | 43.7 m ≈ | 31.5 m | 33.4 m | 30.5 m ≈ | 34.3 m ≈ | 34.3 m | 23.9 m | 64.2 m ≈ |
≈ derived quarter (cumulative difference / share-days average)
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Today's P/E sits at the 100 percentile of its own 6-quarter history (min 8.9, median 13.4, max 19.3; quarters with earnings only).
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 73.3 m | 78.8 m | 46.9 m | 93.4 m | 170.8 m | 163.8 m | 161.5 m | 152.8 m |
| Revenue YoY | +27.9% | +7.5% | −40.4% | +99.1% | +82.8% | −4.1% | −1.4% | −5.4% |
| Net income | 53.9 m | 52.8 m | 21.9 m | 70.2 m | 130.6 m | 114.1 m | 92.4 m | 57.4 m |
| Net income YoY | +40.3% | −2.1% | −58.6% | +220.9% | +86.1% | −12.6% | −19.0% | −38.0% |
| Diluted EPS | unavailable | unavailable | 0.61 | 1.94 | 3.35 | 2.85 | 2.13 | 1.16 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | +218.0% | +72.7% | −14.9% | −25.3% | −45.5% |
| net % | 73.6% | 67.0% | 46.6% | 75.1% | 76.5% | 69.7% | 57.2% | 37.5% |
| Free cash flow | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2025 · 31 Dec 2025
- Cash
- 41.9 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- unavailable USD
- Total assets
- 309.6 m USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 15.54x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- 17.0%
- FCF margin
- unavailable
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 46.9 m | 93.4 m | 170.8 m | 163.8 m | 161.5 m | 152.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 11.9 m | 10.5 m | 19.1 m | 26.3 m | 42.6 m | 66.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Net income | 21.9 m | 70.2 m | 130.6 m | 114.1 m | 92.4 m | 57.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Diluted EPS | 0.61 | 1.94 | 3.35 | 2.85 | 2.13 | 1.16 | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 11.2 m | 28.3 m | 40.8 m | 47.0 m | 42.5 m | 41.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Current assets | 18.2 m | 46.7 m | 62.5 m | 69.7 m | 67.8 m | 58.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Total assets | 88.3 m | 146.8 m | 176.2 m | 191.1 m | 366.8 m | 309.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Accounts payable | 1.6 m | 2.5 m | 3.1 m | 4.2 m | 4.0 m | 3.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Current liabilities | 1.9 m | 2.8 m | 3.4 m | 4.5 m | 4.2 m | 3.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Total liabilities | 3.8 m | 4.4 m | 4.7 m | 5.5 m | 5.0 m | 4.3 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | 39.4 m | 70.3 m | 147.1 m | 139.8 m | 132.6 m | 132.5 m | SEC (XBRL)· 24 Feb 2026verified |
| Investing cash flow | 6.1 m | 2.6 m | 2.1 m | 2.3 m | — | — | SEC (XBRL)· 22 Feb 2024verified |
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 5 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 37.5% of at least 60%
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: 1.4 bn USD
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
Score by group
38% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
The combined range = the median of the valid methods' low, central and high values; it is not a probability interval and does not cover every result. Envelope of all methods: 13.28 – 22.54 USD.
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Method ranges (USD per share)
— — Mid · ▏ Price
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · the input exists, but its latest figure is far older than the latest reported period: not used
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/E13.28 – 22.54 (Mid 16.93)18 companies used · median multiple 9.5x · quartiles 7.5x – 12.7xAPA, CKX, DEC, DVN, EOG, EQT, EXE, GPRK, KRP, MNR, MTDR, OVV, OXY, PARR, PR, REPX, SD, TTE
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 37.5% of at least 60%
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | 45.5% | 95 (vs peers) | 17% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | -3.6% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 22% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | -29.8% | 0 (on a fixed band) | 22% |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 13.9x | 100 (on a fixed band) | 11% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | 15.6x | 29 (vs peers) | 28% |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet· partial100/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Growth0/100 · 2/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial95/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partial29/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. (DMLP). Latest full fiscal year: 2025; data up to 2026-06-30.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 152.8 m USD in 2025; YoY growth -5.4%; net margin 45.5%.
The estimated value range is 13.28–22.54 USD per share (median of 1 methods, agreement: single method); assumptions are illustrative. Against the central value of 16.93 USD, the price of 27.80 USD leaves a potential of -39.1% (value / price − 1) and a margin of safety of -64.3% (1 − price / value). The range is the median of the methods' low, central and high values, not a probability interval.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 5 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 37.5% of at least 60%).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Net margin: 45.5%
- Current ratio: 13.9x
What contradicts it
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: -3.6%
- EPS CAGR 3Y: -29.8%
- P/E (TTM): 15.6x
- The price is above the estimated value range
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, Net debt / EBITDA, Interest coverage, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gas (SIC 1311) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 39 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTETotalEnergies SE | 199.6 bn | 15.7 | 11.3% | 6.5% | −6.2% | +38% / +33% |
| PBRPetrobras - Petroleo Brasileiro SA | 145.9 bn | 33.8 | 10.9% | 8.2% | −10.7% | +56% / +28% |
| EOGEog Resources, Inc. | 81.4 bn | 12.1 | 22.5% | 25.4% | −4.5% | +44% / +26% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corporation | 60.4 bn | 9.1 | 18.9% | 33.7% | −1.9% | +44% / +2% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc. | 53.9 bn | 37.4 | 3.8% | 8.6% | +35.8% | +26% / +25% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp | 52.4 bn | 11.3 | 11.5% | 16.7% | +7.8% | +28% / +6% |
| EQTEqt Corporation | 33.9 bn | 12.9 | 10.9% | 28.4% | +63.9% | −11% / +36% |
| EXEExpand Energy Corporation | 20.8 bn | 7.8 | 14.6% | 19.8% | +186.3% | −26% / +12% |
| PRPermian Resources Corporation | 20.1 bn | 15.9 | 11.5% | 21.5% | +1.3% | +66% / +83% |
| OVVOvintiv Inc. | 17.9 bn | 13.4 | 12.1% | 12.8% | −2.7% | +62% / +50% |
| APAApa Corporation | 16.7 bn | 10.1 | 25.9% | — | unavailable | +91% / +33% |
| MTDRMatador Resources Company | 6.2 bn | 8.6 | 12.8% | 19.9% | +5.5% | +19% / −13% |
| CRCCalifornia Resources Corp | 4.3 bn | — | -15.5% | -18.1% | +14.7% | +1% / −6% |
| PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc. | 3.5 bn | 4.1 | 54.7% | 9.9% | −6.4% | +53% / +103% |
| TALOTalos Energy Inc. | 2.6 bn | — | -17.8% | -20.5% | −9.8% | +36% / +12% |
| NOGNorthern Oil And Gas, Inc. | 2.4 bn | — | -22.1% | -25.4% | +11.2% | −1% / −40% |
| MNRMach Natural Resources LP | 1.7 bn | 19.1 | — | 7.4% | +21.2% | −15% / −43% |
| DMLPDorchester Minerals, L.P. | 1.4 bn | 15.6 | — | 45.5% | −5.4% | +19% / −2% |
| REPXRiley Exploration Permian, Inc. | 950.0 m | 7.8 | 19.9% | 24.5% | −4.4% | +57% / +74% |
| DECDiversified Energy Company | 943.4 m | 2.3 | 47.6% | 22.6% | +141.5% | −11% / +1,434% |
| EGYVaalco Energy Inc | 568.0 m | — | -24.4% | -31.1% | −25.0% | +51% / +16% |
| GPRKGeoPark LTD | 487.6 m | 9.9 | 22.1% | 10.1% | −25.5% | +16% / +4% |
| SDSandridge Energy, Inc. | 468.3 m | 5.7 | 16.2% | 46.1% | +24.8% | −11% / −9% |
| KRPKimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 415.5 m | 4.1 | — | 29.7% | +7.9% | +24% / +1% |
| GTEGran Tierra Energy Inc. | 355.6 m | — | -97.9% | -40.0% | −4.0% | +122% / +59% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for DMLP from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Illustrative: not forecasts and without probabilities. Each case is one coherent set of assumptions, computed on today's figures.
Estimated price (USD)
| Estimated price | Bear | Base | Bull |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 years | 15.09 Total return -46% · Per year -46% | 26.79 Total return -4% · Per year -4% | 40.51 Total return 46% · Per year 46% |
| 3 years | 12.35 Total return -56% · Per year -24% | 24.88 Total return -11% · Per year -4% | 41.63 Total return 50% · Per year 14% |
| 5 years | 10.10 Total return -64% · Per year -18% | 23.10 Total return -17% · Per year -4% | 42.77 Total return 54% · Per year 9% |
- Exit P/E± 6.22
- Net margin± 4.35
- Annual revenue growth± 3.88
- Annual dilution± 0.37
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
In brief
Dorchester Minerals is a Nasdaq-listed limited partnership that holds mineral, royalty and net profits interests in oil and natural gas across 28 states without operating the wells. Its income depends on oil and gas prices, which fell sharply for gas in the first half of 2026 while oil rose, and the company has kept adding acreage through unit-for-interest acquisitions.
SWOT
Strengths
- A debt-free structure and a policy of distributing all available cash give unitholders clear financial discipline.
- Acreage spread across many states and counties reduces dependence on a single region or operator.
- The company bears no direct drilling costs, which limits its exposure to technical production risks.
Weaknesses
- The company does not control development of its properties or operator decisions, which limits its influence over volumes.
- Revenue depends on oil and gas prices with no hedging, so price declines flow directly into distributions.
- Limited financial and human resources leave the company at a disadvantage in bidding for new properties.
Opportunities
- Continued operator development of acreage could bring new production that offsets natural decline.
- Unit-for-interest acquisitions such as the Williston Basin deal could widen the revenue base if the market accepts them.
- Lease bonus and assignment payments could add revenue if operators keep leasing activity going.
Threats
- Price volatility, influenced by OPEC+ and geopolitical conflict, could cut distributions quickly.
- Lower drilling activity or operator consolidation could reduce volumes and acquisition opportunities.
- Environmental and tax regulation and tariffs could raise operator costs and affect output.
Risks
- Dependence on oil and gas priceshigh
Distributions depend heavily on realized prices, which have been very volatile, and the company does not hedge its production 12.
- Lack of control over operationshigh
The company does not decide on drilling or development, and operators can reduce activity or abandon wells 1.
- Suspension of payments over title issuesmedium
Operators can suspend royalty payments if title documentation is judged insufficient, which can materially affect cash flow 1.
- Lease expiry or terminationmedium
If operators do not drill enough, leases can expire and development rights revert to the company without immediate income 1.
- Operator insolvencymedium
If an operator enters bankruptcy, recovery of amounts owed can be delayed or only partial 1.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If oil prices stay firm and volumes keep rising through acquisitions, distributions could support unitholder yield.
- The debt-free structure and acreage spread across many states could offer stability through periods of volatility.
- If operators step up development, new production could offset the natural decline of reserves.
What would break the thesis
- If gas prices stay low, Royalty Properties revenue could keep shrinking, as seen in the first half of 2026.
- The company cannot control operator decisions, and a cut in drilling activity could hit volumes and distributions.
- Acquisitions paid in units dilute existing unitholders, and the per-unit benefit depends on the yield of the acreage bought.
What to watch
- Gas and oil price trends in Royalty Properties revenueQ4 2026
- Quarterly distribution per unit and size of cash flowQ4 2026
- Effect of the Williston Basin acquisition on NPI and Royalty volumes2027
- NPI capital commitments and drilling activity in the Bakkennext 10-K
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
The business
Dorchester Minerals, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership run from Dallas whose stated goal is to provide an attractive yield to unitholders. It does not operate wells; it owns mineral, royalty, overriding royalty and net profits interests, and most income comes from the Royalty Properties and the NPI, which pays 96.97% of net profits realized by the Operating Partnership in the prior month 1. The partnership must distribute 100% of available cash each quarter and has no credit facility, so it grows by issuing units in exchange for interests 1.
Acquisitions are mostly non-taxable exchanges of common units for mineral and royalty interests. These have included acreage in Colorado, Texas and New Mexico and, on July 31, 2026, about 3,100 net royalty acres in the Williston Basin of North Dakota 23. The company aims to avoid unrelated business taxable income, which limits direct participation in development 1.
Revenue is recognized when production occurs, based on estimates, because cash revenue checks usually arrive two to three months after the production month 1. The company also receives lease bonus and assignment income, which can vary considerably from one quarter to the next 3.
Segments
Royalty Properties
Royalty Properties make up most quarterly receipts, at about 37.0 million dollars in the third quarter of 2026 3. Volumes rose in the first half of 2026 versus the prior year, but the average gas price fell to 0.19 dollars per mcf in the second quarter 2.
Market context
Oil and gas prices are driven by factors outside the company's control, including OPEC+, Middle East conflict and tariffs, and management says it cannot predict their effect 2. In the first half of 2026 the average royalty oil price rose 11 percent year on year while the gas price fell 40 percent, a divergent pattern 2. Higher oil prices could support revenue if volumes hold, and associated gas could become more valuable if oil output is curtailed 2.
The company does not sell to customers directly; it receives payments from operators, and customer concentration is modest, although Exxon Mobil and Chevron together accounted for about 25 percent of operating revenues in 2025 1. If an operator suspends payments over title issues, revenue can be delayed significantly 1.
Trends
- Oil and gas price volatilitymixed
Average royalty gas prices fell from 2.50 dollars per mcf to 1.49 dollars in the first half of 2026 while oil rose 2. If volatility persists, distributions could fluctuate sharply from quarter to quarter 1.
- Volume growth from acquisitionstailwind
Royalty oil and gas volumes rose 31 and 10 percent respectively in the first half of 2026, supported by new acreage in Colorado and the Williston Basin 23. If acquisitions continue, the production base could keep expanding.
- Natural decline of reservesheadwind
Oil and gas reserves are depleting assets, so production falls over time and must be replaced through new acquisitions or operator development 1. Lower drilling activity by operators, as seen in the Bakken, directly reduces NPI volumes 12.
- Tariff and geopolitical uncertaintymixed
Tariffs and conflicts involving Iran, Ukraine and Venezuela create uncertainty over costs and prices, and management says their effects are hard to predict 2. Outcomes could be favourable or unfavourable depending on how events unfold.
Competitive position
The company competes for mineral and royalty interests with larger companies that can pay more and bid on more properties 1. It also competes indirectly with other energy sources, mainly on relative price 1. Its limited financial and human resources can leave it at a disadvantage in bidding 1.
The operators of its properties face their own competition from integrated companies, and consolidation in the industry can shift operator interest away from certain areas 1. The company cannot guarantee it will find new properties at attractive prices, since that depends on its ability to evaluate and select suitable acreage 1.
- Exxon Mobil CorporationXOM
Major operator of some of the company's properties; together with Chevron it accounted for a substantial share of royalty operating revenues.
- Chevron CorporationCVX
Important operator of certain properties which, together with Exxon Mobil, represented a significant share of the company's operating revenues.
- Integrated oil and gas companies in the Permian and Bakken
Larger operators that can more easily absorb regulation and offer more for productive properties, competing with the company for acquisitions.
- Other mineral and royalty companies
Direct competitors for acreage and royalty interests, some of which may have greater financial resources than the company.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
No news in our archive over the last 180 days.
SEC filings
- Current report02 Nov 2026Acquisition or disposition of assets · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report22 Oct 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report20 Oct 2026Material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report07 Aug 2026Results of operations · Departure or appointment of officers · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Quarterly report06 Aug 2026
- Current report03 Aug 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report23 Jul 2026Results of operations · Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report06 Jul 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Other events · Financial statements and exhibits
- Current report15 May 2026Shareholder vote
- Current report12 May 2026Regulation FD disclosure · Financial statements and exhibits
Sources
- [1] Form 10-K, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Dorchester Minerals, L.P. · 24 Feb 2026
- [2] Form 10-Q, quarter ended 2026-06-30 · SEC / Dorchester Minerals, L.P. · 06 Aug 2026
- [3] Form 8-K, results release (exhibit 99.1) · SEC / Dorchester Minerals, L.P. · 22 Oct 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.