olivLaw · US equity research
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC PSNY
Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies · SIC 3711 · Vertical: Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies (SIC 3711)
Polestar is a premium electric car brand headquartered in Sweden that builds its range on performance models and on production shared with Volvo Cars and Geely. In fiscal 2025 revenue rose to 3058.1 mn USD, yet the company reported a sizeable loss and an impairment of over 1098.9 mn USD, so its effort to stabilise finances is in focus.
The AI analysis may be outdated: new filings came after its sources (see the «AI analysis» section).
At the close of 04 Nov 2026, Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (PSNY) stock was 4.71 USD (+7.53% on the day), with beta 1.22, 52-week range 3.38–24.00 USD.
Data as of · AI analysis dated · Source: SEC filings and closing prices, computed by olivLaw.
Price history
Loading chart…
Technical reading
- RSI (14)
- 45.0
- neutral
- Bollinger (20, 2)
- 3.09 – 5.19
- in the upper half of the band · %B 0.77 · band width 50.8%
- SMA 50 / 200
- 6.63 / 15.08
- downtrend (price < SMA50 < SMA200)
- MACD (12, 26, 9)
- -0.68 / -0.98
- MACD above signal
Indicators describe past prices; on their own they do not predict direction. On our history the RSI ≤ 40 filter added no return (see the signals methodology).
Performance
| Company | S&P 500 | vs S&P 500 | Vertical median | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 month | −22.8% | −1.1% | −21.7 pp | — |
| 3 months | −68.0% | −0.5% | −67.6 pp | — |
| 6 months | −75.8% | +4.4% | −80.2 pp | — |
| Year to date | −78.0% | +12.3% | −90.3 pp | — |
| 1 year | −78.0% | +13.5% | −91.6 pp | −37.0% |
| 3 years | −93.1% | +76.4% | −169.6 pp | −47.7% |
| 5 years | −98.5% | +63.7% | −162.2 pp | — |
Price returns, dividends excluded.
Quarterly results
ESEF annual reports carry no quarters: the results are annual (below).
E/P over time
E/P = trailing-12-month diluted EPS / price at quarter end. E/P is the inverse of P/E and stays defined when earnings are negative.
Fiscal years
| Fiscal year | 2020 | ⚠ 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 610.2 m | 1.3 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.0 bn |
| Revenue YoY | unavailable | — | +81.7% | −3.0% | −14.1% |
| Net income | -484.9 m | -969.8 m | -479.0 m | -1.2 bn | -2.0 bn |
| Net income YoY | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| Diluted EPS | -0.29 | -0.51 | -0.24 | -0.56 | -0.97 |
| Diluted EPS YoY | unavailable | — | unavailable | unavailable | unavailable |
| net % | -79.5% | -72.2% | -19.6% | -49.9% | -100.8% |
| Free cash flow | -106.6 m | -348.8 m | -1.1 bn | -2.0 bn | -1.1 bn |
The series breaks before 2021: earlier years come from the original reports of the issuer of that time, later years from a subsequent filing that restated the perimeter (a separation, discontinued operations). The year-on-year change across the break is not shown.
Reported results vs expectations
Loading…
Balance sheet & financial health
Fiscal year 2024 · 31 Dec 2024
- Cash
- 739.2 m USD
- Financial debt
- unavailable USD
- Net debt
- unavailable USD
- Equity
- -3.3 bn USD
- Total assets
- 4.1 bn USD
- Debt / equity
- unavailable
- Current ratio
- 0.48x
- ROE
- unavailable
- ROA
- -49.1%
- FCF margin
- -56.0%
Financial statements (source on every figure)
Revenue and net income (USD)
Margins
Income statement · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 610.2 m | 1.3 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.4 bn | 2.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Cost of revenue | 553.7 m | 1.3 bn | 2.3 bn | 2.8 bn | 2.9 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Gross profit | 56.5 m | 11.1 m | 101.1 m | -410.1 m | -876.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Research & development | 183.8 m | 234.0 m | 174.9 m | 157.3 m | 38.4 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Operating income | — | -960.6 m | -1.3 bn | -1.5 bn | -1.8 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Depreciation & amortisation | 216.1 m | 211.6 m | 140.8 m | 115.4 m | 55.7 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| EBITDA | — | -749.1 m ≈ | -1.1 bn ≈ | -1.4 bn ≈ | -1.8 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025derived |
| Interest expense | 34.0 m | 45.2 m | 108.4 m | 213.2 m | 393.8 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Pre-tax income | -471.3 m | -972.9 m | -449.3 m | -1.2 bn | -2.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Income tax | 13.5 m | -3.1 m | 29.8 m | -9.5 m | -9.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Net income | -484.9 m | -969.8 m | -479.0 m | -1.2 bn | -2.0 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Diluted EPS | -0.29 | -0.51 | -0.24 | -0.56 | -0.97 | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Weighted average diluted shares | 1.7 bn | 1.9 bn | 2.0 bn | 2.1 bn | 2.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating income + Depreciation & amortisation.
Balance sheet · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash | 316.4 m | 756.7 m | 973.9 m | 768.3 m | 739.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Inventories | — | 545.7 m | 630.2 m | 927.7 m | 1.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Current assets | — | 1.6 bn | 2.1 bn | 2.3 bn | 2.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Property, plant & equipment, net | — | 208.2 m | 352.3 m | 476.0 m | — | SEC (XBRL)· 23 Apr 2025verified |
| Intangibles (excl. goodwill) | — | 1.3 bn | 1.3 bn | 1.4 bn | 994.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Total assets | — | 3.3 bn | 4.0 bn | 4.3 bn | 4.1 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Current liabilities | — | 3.0 bn | 3.2 bn | 3.6 bn | 4.7 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Total liabilities | — | 3.2 bn | 4.1 bn | 5.5 bn | 7.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Equity | -603.2 m | -183.5 m | -89.9 m | -1.3 bn | -3.3 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
Cash flow · USD
| Line | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Source (latest year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cash flow | -57.1 m | -324.1 m | -1.1 bn | -1.9 bn | -991.2 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Capex | 49.6 m | 24.7 m | 32.3 m | 137.4 m | 147.9 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Free cash flow | -106.6 m ≈ | -348.8 m ≈ | -1.1 bn ≈ | -2.0 bn ≈ | -1.1 bn ≈ | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025derived |
| Investing cash flow | -243.7 m | -126.9 m | -709.0 m | -417.6 m | -412.6 m | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
| Financing cash flow | 359.6 m | 918.7 m | 2.1 bn | 2.1 bn | 1.4 bn | SEC (XBRL)· 09 May 2025verified |
≈ computed by olivLaw from the reported lines of the same year: Operating cash flow − Capex.
Computed indicators
Growth
Profitability
Returns
Balance sheet
Liquidity
Cash
Efficiency
Market and valuation
Risk
Valuation
olivLaw classification
- indicators available: 4 of at least 6
- score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%
- valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
A scoring methodology on indicators and valuation, not investment advice.
Closing price
04 Nov 2026Source: olivLaw, closing series
Market cap: unavailable
Key indicators
Coverage and freshness
The data is older than the freshness threshold.
Score by group
25% · Insufficient data
Estimated value range
unavailable — no valuation method could be computed
Valuation assumptions are editorial choices, not measured; beta is not measured.
Valuation methods
- DCF (discounted cash flow)unavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: EV/EBITDAunavailable · net debt missing: EV cannot be bridged to equity (missing debt is not zero)
- Peers: P/Eunavailable · the base of the ratio is not positive
- Dividend discount (DDM)unavailable · the company pays no dividend: a dividend model needs an explicit initiation assumption
no valuation method could be computed
Classification (SIC) comparables group by industry code, not by economic activity; the direct group is an editorial selection by activity. Members' multiples are on their own trailing twelve months, at their own latest close.
Assumptions (illustrative, editorial)
- Risk-free rate
- 4.3%
- Equity risk premium
- 5.0%
- Beta (default)
- 1.00
- Cost of equity
- 9.3%
- Terminal growth
- 2.5%
Factor scorecard
Insufficient data
Minimum-evidence gate: indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1
| Factor | Value | Score | Weight used |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROIC · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net margin · Quality | -100.8% | 28 (vs peers) | 25% |
| FCF conversion · Quality | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Revenue CAGR 3Y · Growth | 14.8% | 100 (on a fixed band) | 33% |
| EPS CAGR 3Y · Growth | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Net debt / EBITDA · Balance sheet | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Interest coverage · Balance sheet | -4.6x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 25% |
| Current ratio · Balance sheet | 0.5x | 0 (on a fixed band) | 17% |
| P/E (TTM) · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| EV/EBITDA · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| FCF yield · Valuation | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Shareholder yield (distributions) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
| Payout ratio (FCF) · Returns | unavailable | unavailable | — |
Factors without a value were dropped; the remaining weights were renormalised.
Score groups
- Balance sheet0/100 · 2/3 factors with a value
- Growth· partial100/100 · 1/2 factors with a value
- Quality· partial28/100 · 1/3 factors with a value
- Returns· partialunavailable · 0/2 factors with a value
- Valuation· partialunavailable · 0/3 factors with a value
A «partial» group is computed from under half of its weight or from one factor: it is not a full assessment of the group.
Memo
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (PSNY). Latest full fiscal year: 2024; data up to 2024-12-31.
Figures computed from the financial statements: revenue 2.0 bn USD in 2024; YoY growth -14.1%; net margin -100.8%.
Valuation cannot be computed from the available data.
Insufficient data for a verdict (indicators available: 4 of at least 6; score weight coverage: 25.0% of at least 60%; valuation methods computed: 0 of at least 1).
Text generated deterministically from the figures shown; no language model. Not investment advice.
What supports the thesis
- Revenue CAGR 3Y: 14.8%
What contradicts it
- Net margin: -100.8%
- Interest coverage: -4.6x
- Current ratio: 0.5x
Not assessed (insufficient data or a ratio without meaning): ROIC, FCF conversion, EPS CAGR 3Y, Net debt / EBITDA, P/E (TTM), EV/EBITDA, FCF yield, Shareholder yield (distributions), Payout ratio (FCF).
Versus the vertical median
Motor Vehicles & Passenger Car Bodies (SIC 3711) · same industry (4-digit SIC) · compared with 25 companies
Multiples and returns vs the median
Price rebased to 100 (monthly, 5 years)
Companies in the vertical
| Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | Revenue YoY | 1A / 3A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLATesla, Inc. | 1,522.6 bn | 424.6 | 3.8% | 3.1% | −2.9% | −10% / +60% |
| GMGeneral Motors Company | 78.0 bn | 20.6 | 6.1% | 2.1% | −1.3% | +26% / +192% |
| PCARPACCAR Inc | 55.9 bn | 20.2 | 13.7% | 9.5% | −15.5% | +1% / +16% |
| LILi Auto Inc. | 23.5 bn | 144.8 | 1.6% | 1.0% | −18.8% | −37% / −69% |
| RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc. | 20.5 bn | — | -55.0% | -45.9% | +8.4% | −17% / −16% |
| OSKOshkosh Corporation | 8.7 bn | 17.5 | 11.0% | 4.6% | −2.9% | +12% / +47% |
| NIONIO Inc. | 8.2 bn | — | -302.6% | -17.1% | +38.9% | −40% / −55% |
| VFSVinFast Auto Ltd. | 7.8 bn | — | — | -175.5% | +54.7% | +2% / −61% |
| FSSFederal Signal Corporation | 7.2 bn | 24.5 | 20.5% | 11.7% | +17.1% | +3% / +71% |
| LCIDLucid Group, Inc. | 1.3 bn | — | -571.4% | -249.2% | +67.6% | −75% / −92% |
| LOTLotus Technology Inc. | 217.2 m | — | — | -89.4% | −43.8% | −75% / −97% |
| NIUNiu Technologies | 115.3 m | — | -4.4% | -0.9% | +36.7% | −49% / −24% |
| GGRGogoro Inc. | 45.7 m | — | -56.2% | -28.4% | −9.4% | −23% / −94% |
| WKHSWorkhorse Group Inc. | 36.2 m | — | — | -301.5% | +201.1% | −69% / −100% |
| DCXDigital Currency X Technology Inc. | 21.5 m | — | — | -434.9% | −27.1% | −100% / −100% |
| FFAIFaraday Future Intelligent Electric Inc. | 12.2 m | — | -2,030.5% | -21,838.0% | −0.6% | −100% / −100% |
| FLYEFly-E Group, Inc. | 2.8 m | — | -82.2% | -67.9% | −25.0% | −62% / unavailable |
| CENNCenntro Inc. | 434.8 k | — | -126.6% | -423.9% | −42.2% | −98% / −100% |
| FFord Motor Co | — | — | -18.4% | -4.2% | +1.2% | −5% / +23% |
| HMCHonda Motor Co., Ltd. | — | — | 6.7% | 3.9% | +6.2% | +16% / +15% |
| RACEFerrari N.V. | — | — | 42.9% | 22.3% | +7.0% | +10% / +20% |
| XPEVXpeng Inc. | — | — | -7.9% | -46.7% | unavailable | −55% / −41% |
| STLAStellantis N.V. | — | — | -33.0% | -14.5% | −2.1% | −56% / −79% |
| AIIORobo.ai Inc. | — | — | — | -17,614.9% | −92.1% | −96% / −100% |
| TMToyota Motor Corp | — | — | 13.6% | 9.9% | +6.5% | −1% / +5% |
1- and 3-year price returns: for PSNY from daily closes (the same as the performance table), for the other companies from month-end closes.
olivLaw engine forecast
The world engine ran after the company's latest material disclosure. Probabilities are of TOUCHING a level within the horizon (not closing there) and sit next to the random walk (p_rw), the no-information benchmark.
The engine has no published run for this company yet.
Valuation scenarios (editable assumptions)
Illustrative scenarios
Scenarios are not available. input data missing
AI analysis
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 17 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (03 Sept 2026), 6-K (27 Aug 2026), 6-K (09 Jul 2026), 6-K (01 Jul 2026).
In brief
Polestar is a premium electric car brand headquartered in Sweden that builds its range on performance models and on production shared with Volvo Cars and Geely. In fiscal 2025 revenue rose to 3058.1 mn USD, yet the company reported a sizeable loss and an impairment of over 1098.9 mn USD, so its effort to stabilise finances is in focus.
SWOT
Strengths
- Award-winning model design and international brand recognition give an edge over other manufacturers.
- The asset-light model, built on partnerships with Volvo Cars and Geely, gives access to industrial capacity without heavy investment.
- A service network inherited from Volvo Cars supports the customer experience in several countries.
Weaknesses
- Large operating losses and distance from profitability limit the ability to self-fund.
- Reliance on shareholder and bank loans, including amended financing agreements, signals financial fragility.
- Dependence on single-source suppliers and on production in China exposes the company to disruption and tariffs.
Opportunities
- If electric vehicle adoption continues, new models and expansion into France could support volume growth.
- Planned production in Slovakia and the partner-based sales model could lower costs and widen geographic reach.
- Carbon credit and licence income could become an additional source of revenue if environmental regulation holds.
Threats
- Tariffs and policy shifts in the US and EU could reduce margins or demand for imported vehicles.
- Strong competition in the electric premium segment could force price cuts and pressure volumes.
- Geopolitical and economic uncertainty could affect access to financing and consumer demand.
Risks
- Dependence on financinghigh
The company needs additional capital, which might not be available on reasonable terms. A lack of funding could affect product plans.
- Import tariffshigh
Tariffs can raise the cost of imported vehicles and reduce gross margin if prices cannot be adjusted.
- Asset impairmentmedium
Impairments on some models and projects could arise if demand or prices fall below expectations.
- Partner dependencemedium
Production and development depend on Volvo Cars and Geely, and their decisions could affect the company.
- China-related risksmedium
The Chinese government could intervene in operations of the company or its partners, and data rules could add costs.
Investment thesis
What would need to be true (bull case)
- If sales keep growing in key markets such as Europe and the active selling model proves effective, the company could narrow its losses.
- The asset-light model and partners' production capacity could allow the range to expand without very large investment.
- Growth in electric vehicle markets worldwide offers a supportive backdrop if Polestar keeps its design and reputation.
What would break the thesis
- Operating losses and large impairments could signal difficulty reaching profitability in the coming period.
- If tariffs persist or rise, gross margin could stay under pressure, especially in the US market.
- Reliance on loans and debt-to-equity conversions could dilute existing shareholders.
What to watch
- Trend in sales volumes and model mixQ1 2027
- Launch progress of the Polestar 4 SUV and the Polestar 2 successor2027
- Effect of tariffs on gross marginnext 10-K
- New financing and debt-to-equity conversions2027
Products, market & competition
AI-generatedAI-generated analysis (Claude) from cited public sources; it may contain errors. Not investment advice. As of 27 Oct 2026 · Model: claude-haiku-5-5.
Possibly outdated: the newest document it read is from 17 Apr 2026; since then the company filed 6-K (08 Oct 2026), 6-K (03 Sept 2026), 6-K (27 Aug 2026), 6-K (09 Jul 2026), 6-K (01 Jul 2026).
The business
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC is a pure play electric car company, headquartered in Gothenburg, that designs and sells performance cars. Its model is asset-light: production is outsourced to partners Volvo Cars and Geely in Europe, China, South Korea and the US. In 2025 vehicle sales made up most revenue, at 2805.6 mn USD, and the company moved to an active selling model through selling partners, with 211 sales points at year end.
Polestar funds operations through loans and equity investments from shareholders and banks, mainly Geely and Volvo Cars. It has amended financing agreements and converted part of its debt into equity, which indicates that access to capital remains a central concern.
Segments
Vehicle sales
Vehicle sales accounted for 2805.6 mn USD of 2025 revenue, the company's main income source. Retail volume growth of about 34% was supported by the model mix and the shift to the active selling model.
Carbon credit sales
Carbon credit sales rose to 192.4 mn USD in 2025 from almost nothing in earlier years. This income is more volatile than vehicle sales and depends on environmental regulation.
Licences, royalties and other revenue
Licences and royalties, together with leasing and software, make up a small share of revenue. This segment matters less to the profile but reflects a diversification strategy.
Market context
Europe accounted for about 78% of Polestar volumes in 2025, and the European electric vehicle market grew by about 33%, according to sources cited in the report. In the US, where the company sold about 7% of vehicles, demand was affected by policy shifts and the expiry of tax credits on 30 September 2025. The global electric vehicle market reached 20.1 mn cars in 2025, up 20%.
Trends
- Growing electric vehicle adoptiontailwind
Rising global electric vehicle sales and regulatory pressure in the EU and UK support demand for Polestar models. If this trend continues, volumes could grow faster than in 2025.
- Tariffs and trade policyheadwind
US and EU tariffs on vehicles from China raise costs. The company is trying to offset them through production in several regions, but uncertainty remains high.
- Demand in the premium segmentmixed
Demand for premium vehicles depends on disposable income, financing costs and customer preferences. Changes in these factors could influence demand for the company's luxury models.
- Raw material and interest rate costsheadwind
Prices of lithium, cobalt and nickel, along with interest rates, affect production and financing costs. High rates on floating-rate borrowings add pressure on profitability.
Competitive position
Polestar competes with pure electric manufacturers such as Tesla and with established premium carmakers that also sell combustion-engine vehicles. Its advantage lies in award-winning design and access to the Volvo Cars and Geely platforms, which lower development costs.
Competitive pressure is intense, and the electric premium segment is sensitive to price and buyer demand. The company needs a steady pace of launches to keep its position.
- TeslaTSLA
Pure electric manufacturer named explicitly in the Polestar report as a main competitor.
- Volvo Cars
Strategic partner that is also a competitor in the premium segment, supplying platforms and a service network.
- Geely Group
Shareholder and production partner supplying platforms and industrial capacity, and also a competitor in the Chinese market.
- Traditional premium carmakers with combustion engines
Established premium companies selling both electric and combustion-engine vehicles, cited in the report as part of the competition.
Links, dependencies and risks
Who the company is tied to, from its own SEC filings (customers, suppliers, production, partners, competitors, countries, regulation), from the 5 %+ holders' statements (13D/13G) and from what other companies say about it. Click a node for its evidence; on a listed company the graph moves to it.
Loading the links…
News & filings
In the press
- Polestar (PSNY)’s US Exit Just Showed Up in its GuidanceYahoo Finance — News · 17 Sept 2026 · EN
- Polestar Automotive Holding UK Q2 Earnings Call HighlightsYahoo Finance — News · 03 Sept 2026 · EN
- Acuzații de retragere mascată de pe piață, cu despăgubiri uriașe. Dealerii Polestar din SUA vin cu acuzațiiProfit.ro · 26 Aug 2026 · RO
- Polestar claims it was blindsided by sales banThe Verge · 25 Aug 2026 · EN
- Polestar owners left ‘holding the bag’ after EV brand pulls out of the USThe Verge · 10 Jul 2026 · EN
- Feds Killed Polestar and Spared Volvo. That Should Terrify YouHacker News · 28 Jun 2026 · EN
- Polestar has been muscled out of the US marketThe Verge · 25 Jun 2026 · EN
- Polestar 4 Coupe launches in Korea with chassis upgrades, price cutsKorea Times — Business · 10 Jun 2026 · RO
- Polestar CEO tells CNBC ‘pump anxiety’ has made EVs ‘all about money’CNBC World · 14 May 2026 · EN
- Zeekr targets Tesla, Polestar, Genesis in bid to replicate BYD riseKorea Times — Business · 11 May 2026 · RO
The latest news item in our archive is from 17 Sept 2026; the newest SEC filing is from 08 Oct 2026. The press archive comes from the RSS feeds we follow and does not necessarily cover the latest event — the filings alongside do.
SEC filings
- Current report (foreign issuer)08 Oct 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)03 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)03 Sept 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)27 Aug 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)09 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)01 Jul 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)26 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)25 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)03 Jun 2026
- Current report (foreign issuer)19 May 2026
Sources
- [1] Form 20-F, fiscal year ended 2025-12-31 · SEC / Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC · 17 Apr 2026
Figures computed by olivLaw from SEC filings and closing prices; the qualitative analysis is AI-generated from cited sources. Not investment advice.